East Tennessee Land Evaluation
Oct 02, 2025
East TN FFA Land Evaluation
Overall

ID: 42 - -
Team Name: Bradley
Participant Name:
COOPERR WEEKS
Individual Rank: 23
Individual Total Score: 309
Team Rank: 7
Team Total Score: 939
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
46
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
40
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Footslope
Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
Moderate
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
27
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Moderately steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
35
Part 1 Total
148
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
23
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Medium
Low
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
13
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Class II
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Medium
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
16
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class VI
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Low
Low
Class VII
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
17
Part 2 Total
69
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
15
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
8
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
3
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Grass/legume cover
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Trees
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
8
Part 3 Total
34
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Poor
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
10
Part 4 Total
58
Field 1 Total
100
Field 2 Total
77
Field 3 Total
62
Field 4 Total
70


AWS100: Tuesday, November 4, 2025