KINLEYY KNIGHT - Chuckey-Doak - East TN FFA Land Evaluation - East Tennessee Land Evaluation

JudgingCard.com Results Events Individual Scorecard

East Tennessee Land Evaluation
Oct 02, 2025
East TN FFA Land Evaluation

Overall

ID:	2 - -
Team Name:	Chuckey-Doak
Participant Name:	KINLEYY KNIGHT
Individual Rank:	93
Individual Total Score:	141
Team Rank:	22
Team Total Score:	530
View e-Scansheet

Definition

Responses

Score

Part 1 - Field 1

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Medium Fine Moderately deep None or few Well-drained None or few Low Nearly level None to slight Footslope	Medium Medium Deep None or few Well-drained None or few High Nearly level None to slight Upland or terrace

Part 1 Point Values

5562626635

Part 1 - Field 2

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Medium Fine Shallow Common Moderately well-drained Common Medium Gently sloping Moderate Flood Plain	Medium Medium Deep None or few Well-drained None or few High Sloping None to slight Upland or terrace

Part 1 Point Values

5562626635

Part 1 - Field 3

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Medium Fine Moderately deep Common Excessively drained Common Low Nearly level Moderate Footslope	Medium Fine Deep None or few Well-drained None or few High Gently sloping Moderate Upland or terrace

Part 1 Point Values

5562626635

Part 1 - Field 4

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Coarse Medium Shallow Common Excessively drained Common Medium Sloping None to slight Upland or terrace	Medium Fine Moderately deep None or few Well-drained None or few Medium Steep None to slight Upland or terrace

Part 1 Point Values

5562626635

Part 1 Total

Part 2 - Field 1

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Class I Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Low Medium Medium High High High High Medium Medium	Class I No No No No No No No No High High High High High High High Low Low

Part 2 Point Value

411111111111111122

Part 2 - Field 2

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Class II Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium High High Medium	Class III No Yes No No No No No Medium Medium High Medium High High High High Low

Part 2 Point Value

411111111111111122

Part 2 - Field 3

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Class II Yes Yes No No No Yes No No Medium High High Medium High Medium Medium Medium High	Class II No Yes No No No No No No High High High High High High High Medium Low

Part 2 Point Value

411111111111111122

Part 2 - Field 4

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Class I No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Medium Medium Medium High High High Low Medium Medium	Class VII No Yes No No No No Yes No Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low

Part 2 Point Value

411111111111111122

Part 2 Total

Part 3 - Field 1

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Annual crops with grass/legume Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes	Annual crops with minimal conservation No No No No No No Yes No Yes

Part 3 Point Values

6111111111

Part 3 - Field 2

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Grass/legume cover No No No Yes Yes No No Yes No	Annual crops with grass/legume No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Part 3 Point Values

6111111111

Part 3 - Field 3

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Annual crops with intensive conservation Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes	Annual crops with intensive conservation No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Part 3 Point Values

6111111111

Part 3 - Field 4

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Annual crops with minimal conservation Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes No	Trees No No No No No No No No No

Part 3 Point Values

6111111111

Part 3 Total

Part 4 - Field 1

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Fair	Good Good Good Good Good Good Good

Part 4 Point Values

2222224

Part 4 - Field 2

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Fair Good Good Good Good Good Fair	Good Good Good Good Good Good Good

Part 4 Point Values

2222224

Part 4 - Field 3

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Fair Fair Fair Good Poor Good Fair	Good Good Good Good Good Good Good

Part 4 Point Values

2222224

Part 4 - Field 4

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Good Good Good Poor Good Fair Poor	Good Good Poor Poor Good Good Poor

Part 4 Point Values

2222224

Part 4 Total

Field 1 Total

Field 2 Total

Field 3 Total

Field 4 Total

AWS100: Monday, November 3, 2025