East Tennessee Land Evaluation
Oct 02, 2025
East TN FFA Land Evaluation
Overall

ID: 2 - -
Team Name: Chuckey-Doak
Participant Name:
DAKINE THOMPSON
Individual Rank: 73
Individual Total Score: 189
Team Rank: 22
Team Total Score: 530
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Coarse
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Low
Gently sloping
Moderate
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
26
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Coarse
Coarse
Moderately deep
Common
Excessively drained
Common
Low
Sloping
None to slight
Footslope
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
9
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
Medium
Nearly level
Moderate
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
Moderate
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
26
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Fine
Shallow
Many
Poorly-drained
Many
High
Moderately steep
Severe
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
15
Part 1 Total
76
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Low
Medium
Medium
High
Low
Medium
Low
Medium
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
10
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Medium
Low
Low
Medium
Medium
Low
Low
Low
Low
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
13
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
Medium
High
Medium
High
Low
High
Medium
High
Class II
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Medium
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
13
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class V
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Medium
Low
Medium
Low
Low
Low
High
Medium
Low
Class VII
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
9
Part 2 Total
45
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
10
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
14
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
6
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Grass/legume cover
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Trees
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
2
Part 3 Total
32
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
12
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Poor
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Poor
Poor
Poor
Fair
Good
Fair
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 Total
36
Field 1 Total
58
Field 2 Total
44
Field 3 Total
53
Field 4 Total
34


AWS100: Tuesday, November 4, 2025