LUKE BAILEY - Chuckey-Doak - East TN FFA Land Evaluation - East Tennessee Land Evaluation

JudgingCard.com Results Events Individual Scorecard

East Tennessee Land Evaluation
Oct 02, 2025
East TN FFA Land Evaluation

Overall

ID:	2 - -
Team Name:	Chuckey-Doak
Participant Name:	LUKE BAILEY
Individual Rank:	85
Individual Total Score:	166
Team Rank:	22
Team Total Score:	530
View e-Scansheet

Definition

Responses

Score

Part 1 - Field 1

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Fine Fine Moderately deep None or few Well-drained None or few Medium Gently sloping None to slight Footslope	Medium Medium Deep None or few Well-drained None or few High Nearly level None to slight Upland or terrace

Part 1 Point Values

5562626635

Part 1 - Field 2

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Fine Fine Shallow Well-drained None or few High Sloping None to slight Upland or terrace	Medium Medium Deep None or few Well-drained None or few High Sloping None to slight Upland or terrace

Part 1 Point Values

5562626635

Part 1 - Field 3

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Medium Medium Moderately deep None or few Well-drained None or few Medium Sloping None to slight Upland or terrace	Medium Fine Deep None or few Well-drained None or few High Gently sloping Moderate Upland or terrace

Part 1 Point Values

5562626635

Part 1 - Field 4

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Coarse Coarse Very Shallow Common Excessively drained None or few Low None to slight Upland or terrace	Medium Fine Moderately deep None or few Well-drained None or few Medium Steep None to slight Upland or terrace

Part 1 Point Values

5562626635

Part 1 Total

Part 2 - Field 1

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Class II No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Low Low Low Medium Low Low Low Medium Low	Class I No No No No No No No No High High High High High High High Low Low

Part 2 Point Value

411111111111111122

Part 2 - Field 2

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Class IV No Yes Yes Yes No No No No Low Low Low Medium Low Low Low	Class III No Yes No No No No No Medium Medium High Medium High High High High Low

Part 2 Point Value

411111111111111122

Part 2 - Field 3

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Class IV No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Low Low Low Low Medium Low Low Low Medium	Class II No Yes No No No No No No High High High High High High High Medium Low

Part 2 Point Value

411111111111111122

Part 2 - Field 4

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Class V No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Low Low Low Low Low Low Low	Class VII No Yes No No No No Yes No Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low

Part 2 Point Value

411111111111111122

Part 2 Total

Part 3 - Field 1

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Annual crops with intensive conservation No Yes No No Yes No No No No	Annual crops with minimal conservation No No No No No No Yes No Yes

Part 3 Point Values

6111111111

Part 3 - Field 2

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Grass/legume cover No Yes No No No No No No No	Annual crops with grass/legume No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Part 3 Point Values

6111111111

Part 3 - Field 3

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Annual crops with intensive conservation No No No No No No No No No	Annual crops with intensive conservation No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Part 3 Point Values

6111111111

Part 3 - Field 4

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Annual crops with minimal conservation No No No No Yes No No No No	Trees No No No No No No No No No

Part 3 Point Values

6111111111

Part 3 Total

Part 4 - Field 1

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Good Good Good Good Good Good Fair	Good Good Good Good Good Good Good

Part 4 Point Values

2222224

Part 4 - Field 2

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Good Good Good Good Good Good Fair	Good Good Good Good Good Good Good

Part 4 Point Values

2222224

Part 4 - Field 3

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Good Poor Good Good Good Good Poor	Good Good Good Good Good Good Good

Part 4 Point Values

2222224

Part 4 - Field 4

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Good Good Good Fair Fair Good Poor	Good Good Poor Poor Good Good Poor

Part 4 Point Values

2222224

Part 4 Total

Field 1 Total

Field 2 Total

Field 3 Total

Field 4 Total

AWS100: Tuesday, November 4, 2025