East Tennessee Land Evaluation
Oct 02, 2025
East TN FFA Land Evaluation
Overall

ID: 131 - -
Team Name: LENOIR CITY
Participant Name:
CHARLOTT SHOPE
Individual Rank: 79
Individual Total Score: 173
Team Rank: 24
Team Total Score: 496
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
Moderate
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
31
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Moderately well-drained
None or few
Medium
Gently sloping
Moderate
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
19
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Shallow
Common
Poorly-drained
Common
Low
Gently sloping
Moderate
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
Moderate
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
19
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Coarse
Coarse
Shallow
Common
Well-drained
Common
Medium
Steep
Moderate
Footslope
Medium
Fine
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
18
Part 1 Total
87
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class I
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Low
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
15
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Medium
Low
Low
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
14
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class I
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Medium
Medium
Low
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Low
Low
Class II
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Medium
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
6
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Low
Low
Medium
Low
Medium
Low
Low
Class VII
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
11
Part 2 Total
46
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
12
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
4
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Grass/legume cover
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
2
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Trees
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
4
Part 3 Total
22
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Good
Poor
Poor
Fair
Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
2
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Fair
Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
4
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Poor
Good
Poor
Poor
Fair
Fair
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
2
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Poor
Fair
Fair
Fair
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
10
Part 4 Total
18
Field 1 Total
60
Field 2 Total
41
Field 3 Total
29
Field 4 Total
43


AWS100: Tuesday, November 4, 2025