East Tennessee Land Evaluation
Oct 02, 2025
East TN FFA Land Evaluation
Overall

ID: 297 - -
Team Name: SCIENCE HILL
Participant Name:
RYAN WOODS *
Individual Rank: 75
Individual Total Score: 182
Team Rank: 15
Team Total Score: 777
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
34
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
28
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
Moderate
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
32
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Fine
Fine
Moderately deep
None or few
Excessively drained
None or few
Medium
Moderately steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
29
Part 1 Total
123
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class I
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
High
High
High
High
Medium
High
Medium
Medium
High
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
11
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class I
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
High
High
High
High
Medium
High
Medium
Medium
Medium
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
6
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class I
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
High
High
High
High
Medium
High
Medium
Medium
Medium
Class II
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Medium
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
12
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
Medium
High
High
High
Medium
High
Medium
Medium
Medium
Class VII
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
4
Part 2 Total
33
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
10
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
5
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
7
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Trees
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
2
Part 3 Total
24
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
0
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Good
Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
2
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
0
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
0
Part 4 Total
2
Field 1 Total
55
Field 2 Total
41
Field 3 Total
51
Field 4 Total
35


AWS100: Tuesday, November 4, 2025