East Tennessee Land Evaluation
Oct 02, 2025
East TN FFA Land Evaluation
Overall

ID: 211 - -
Team Name: Tazewell FFA
Participant Name:
ELI KECK
Individual Rank: 16
Individual Total Score: 319
Team Rank: 10
Team Total Score: 890
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
None to slight
Flood Plain
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
35
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
46
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Footslope
Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
Moderate
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
27
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Fine
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
46
Part 1 Total
154
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
18
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
Low
Low
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
20
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Class II
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Medium
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
15
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class VI
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
Medium
Class VII
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
13
Part 2 Total
66
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
8
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
8
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
7
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Trees
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Trees
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
14
Part 3 Total
37
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
14
Part 4 Total
62
Field 1 Total
77
Field 2 Total
90
Field 3 Total
65
Field 4 Total
87


AWS100: Tuesday, November 4, 2025