East Tennessee Land Evaluation
Oct 02, 2025
East TN FFA Land Evaluation
Overall

ID: 72 - -
Team Name: UNAKA
Participant Name:
KENDRAA MCCOSTLIN
Individual Rank: 41
Individual Total Score: 284
Team Rank: 8
Team Total Score: 919
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
40
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
46
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
Moderate
Footslope
Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
Moderate
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
30
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
29
Part 1 Total
145
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
Low
High
Low
Low
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
17
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
Low
High
Low
Low
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
12
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
Low
Low
Class II
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Medium
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
11
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class VI
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
Low
Low
Class VII
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
17
Part 2 Total
57
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
8
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
8
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
9
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Grass/legume cover
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Trees
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
1
Part 3 Total
26
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
10
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
14
Part 4 Total
56
Field 1 Total
81
Field 2 Total
82
Field 3 Total
60
Field 4 Total
61


AWS100: Tuesday, November 4, 2025