East Tennessee Land Evaluation
Oct 02, 2025
East TN FFA Land Evaluation
Overall

ID: 131 - -
Team Name: LENOIR CITY
Participant Name:
HAYDENN OTWELLV
Individual Rank: 74
Individual Total Score: 187
Team Rank: 24
Team Total Score: 496
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Gently sloping
None to slight
Flood Plain
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
23
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Shallow
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
34
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Coarse
Medium
Shallow
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
Moderate
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
21
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Coarse
Coarse
Shallow
None or few
Excessively drained
Common
Low
Very Steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Fine
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
10
Part 1 Total
88
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Low
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
12
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
14
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Low
Class II
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Medium
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
7
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class VI
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
Low
Class VII
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
5
Part 2 Total
38
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
3
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
13
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
12
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Grass/legume cover
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Trees
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
5
Part 3 Total
33
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Good
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
2
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
6
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Fair
Fair
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
12
Part 4 Total
28
Field 1 Total
46
Field 2 Total
63
Field 3 Total
46
Field 4 Total
32


AWS100: Tuesday, November 4, 2025