Middle Tennessee Land and Soil Evaluation
Oct 02, 2025
Middle Tennessee Land/ Soils Senior Division
Overall

ID: 146 - -
Team Name: Coffee County
Participant Name:
TRACE PARKER
Individual Rank: 93
Individual Total Score: 238
Team Rank: 28
Team Total Score: 681
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
34
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
Steep
Moderate
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Moderately steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
23
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Shallow
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
40
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Gently sloping
None to slight
Footslope
Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
41
Part 1 Total
138
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
Medium
High
High
High
Low
Low
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
18
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class IV
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
High
Class IV
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
15
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
14
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
High
High
High
Medium
High
High
High
Medium
Medium
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
Medium
Medium
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
16
Part 2 Total
63
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
3
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Grass/legume cover
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
1
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
3
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
0
Part 3 Total
7
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Fair
Good
Fair
Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
6
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Fair
Fair
Poor
Fair
Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Part 4 Point Values2222224
4
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
14
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Fair
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
6
Part 4 Total
30
Field 1 Total
61
Field 2 Total
43
Field 3 Total
71
Field 4 Total
63


AWS100: Tuesday, November 4, 2025