Middle Tennessee Land and Soil Evaluation
Oct 02, 2025
Middle Tennessee Land/ Soils Senior Division
Overall

ID: 50 - -
Team Name: CORNERSVILLE
Participant Name:
LANDON GARRETT
Individual Rank: 95
Individual Total Score: 236
Team Rank: 35
Team Total Score: 536
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Gently sloping
None to slight
Footslope
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
29
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Low
Moderately steep
Moderate
Flood Plain
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Moderately steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
26
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
29
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
40
Part 1 Total
124
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Low
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
12
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class IV
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
Low
Low
Class IV
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
19
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
Low
Low
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
18
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
Medium
Medium
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
7
Part 2 Total
56
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
3
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
4
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
3
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
2
Part 3 Total
12
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
12
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Fair
Fair
Fair
Poor
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Part 4 Point Values2222224
10
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
14
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
8
Part 4 Total
44
Field 1 Total
56
Field 2 Total
59
Field 3 Total
64
Field 4 Total
57


AWS100: Tuesday, November 4, 2025