Middle Tennessee Land and Soil Evaluation
Oct 02, 2025
Middle Tennessee Land/ Soils Senior Division
Overall

ID: 32 - -
Team Name: CLAY COUNTY
Participant Name:
SETH GILPATRICK
Individual Rank: 10
Individual Total Score: 353
Team Rank: 5
Team Total Score: 1016
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
46
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Moderately steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Moderately steep
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
46
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
46
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
Many
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Nearly level
None to slight
Flood Plain
Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
33
Part 1 Total
171
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
20
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class IV
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
Low
Class IV
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
22
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
18
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class I
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
High
Medium
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
Medium
Medium
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
8
Part 2 Total
68
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
15
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
15
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
14
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
8
Part 3 Total
52
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Poor
Poor
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
14
Part 4 Total
62
Field 1 Total
97
Field 2 Total
99
Field 3 Total
94
Field 4 Total
63


AWS100: Tuesday, November 4, 2025