Gaby Brown - Miami Valley Career Tech Center FFA - Environmental and Natural Resources - 2025 National FFA CDEs/LDEs

JudgingCard.com Results Events Individual Scorecard

2025 National FFA CDEs/LDEs
Oct 29, 2025
Environmental and Natural Resources

Overall

ID:	1035 - 0 - 3
Team Name:	Miami Valley Career Tech Center FFA
Participant Name:	Gaby Brown
Individual Rank:	64
Individual Total Score:	396
Team Rank:	13
Team Total Score:	2275.333
View e-Scansheet

Definition

Responses

Score

Land Part 1

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Surface Texture: 3. Medium Subsurface Texture: 3. Medium Depth of Soil: 1. Deep Slope: 2. Gently Sloping Erosion: 1. None to Slight Permeability: 3. Slow Surface Runoff: 2. Moderate Major Factors: Permeability Major Factors: Wetness Land Capability Class: 2. II	Surface Texture: 3. Medium Subsurface Texture: 4. Moderately Fine Depth of Soil: 1. Deep Slope: 3. Moderately Sloping Erosion: 2. Moderate Permeability: 3. Slow Surface Runoff: 1. Rapid Major Factors: Slope Major Factors: Erosion Major Factors: Runoff Land Capability Class: 3. III

Land Part 1 - Point Values

Surface Texture 06
Subsurface Texture 06
Depth of Soil 06
Slope 06
Erosion 06
Permeability 06
Surface Runoff 06
Major Factors 09
Land Capability Class 09

Land Part 2

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Every 3rd or 4th year Do not burn crop residue Protect from burning Harvest trees selectively Install drainage system Phosphate (P) Potash (K)	Every 2nd year Do not burn crop residue Residue mgmt. and/or min. tillage Terrace & farm on contour Maintain terraces Phosphate (P) Potash (K)

Land Part 2 - Point Values

1-4. Row Crop 06
5. Crop Residue 05
6. Conservation Tillage 05
7. Legumes 00
8. Range Mgmt 00
9. Burning 00
10. Grazing 00
11. Plant Trees 00
12. Harvest Trees 00
13. Wildlife 00
14. Control Brush 00
15. Contours 06
16. Terraces 06
17. Diversion Terraces 00
18. Drainage 00
19. Gullies 00
20. No Mechanical 00
21. Soil Amendments 00
22. Phosphorus 06
23. Potassium 06
24. Nitrogen 00
25. No Fertilizer 00

Land Judging Total

Water Quality - Test Number

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	Identification 1	Identification 1

Water Quality - Test #1 - pH

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	065	061

Water Quality - Test #1 Tolerance	1
Water Quality - Test #1 Value	16

Water Quality - Test #2 - Temperature

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	500	525

Water Quality - Test #2 Tolerance	15
Water Quality - Test #2 Value	16

Water Quality - Test #3 - Lead

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	01	01

Water Quality - Test #3 Tolerance	0
Water Quality - Test #3 Value	16

Water Quality - Test #4 - Sulfate

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	02	03

Water Quality - Test #4 Tolerance	0
Water Quality - Test #4 Value	16

Water Quality - Test #5 - Nitrite

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	000	003

Water Quality - Test #5 Tolerance	1
Water Quality - Test #5 Value	16

Water Quality - Test #6

Water Quality - Limiting Factors

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	A	A
2	B	A
3	B	B
4	C	C
5	B	B
6	B	B
7	B	B
8	B	B
9	B	C
10	C	C

Water Quality Limiting Factors - PPQ

Water Quality Total

Written Exam

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	B	Omit
2	D	C
3	A	A
4	C	C
5	B	D
6	A	A
7	B	B
8	D	B
9	D	D
10	D	D
11	A	A
12	B	B
13	B	C
14	C	C
15	B	A
16	C	C
17	B	C
18	C	C
19	D	D
20	A	A
21	B	B
22	D	D
23	B	B
24	C	C
25	A	A
26	A	A
27	A	A
28	A	A
29	D	D
30	D	A
31	B	B
32	B	A
33	C	C
34	D	D
35	C	C
36	D	D
37	C	A
38	D	D
39	B	B
40	D	B
41	A	A
42	C	B
43	C	C
44	D	D
45	D	D
46	A	A
47	D	D
48	A	A
49	A	A
50	C	C

Written Exam - Points per Question

Data Interpretation

Data Interpretation - Points per Question

Waste Management

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	A	A
2	B	B
3	C	B
4	A	A
5	C	C
6	D	D
7	B	B
8	B	B
9	D	C
10	B	B

Waste Management - Points per Question

Identification #1-10

Part	Contestant	Judge
1	605	609
2	221	221
3	326	311
4	230	&&&
5	803	&&&
6	233	233
7	216	709
8	717	504
9	224	224
10	112	112