Ohio FFA Soils CDEs
Oct 11, 2025
2025 Ohio FFA State Urban Soils CDE
Overall

ID: 79 - -
Team Name: Elgin
Participant Name:
KASE TIDD
Individual Rank: 66
Individual Total Score: 764
Team Rank: 21
Team Total Score: 2279

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 Soil Prop. - Site 1
PartContestantJudge
11 - 0-2% nearly level
8 - upland depression or flat
11 - No
13 - No
18 - Moderately Fine
23 - Moderately Fine
28 - Moderately Fine
31 - Granular
39 - Deep
43 - Deep
1 - 0-2% nearly level
8 - upland depression or flat
11 - No
13 - No
17 - Medium
23 - Moderately Fine
28 - Moderately Fine
32 - Blocky
37 - Somewhat poorly drained
39 - Deep
43 - Deep
Part 1 - Points per Item10
80
Part 1 Soil Prop. - Site 2
PartContestantJudge
13 - 6-12% sloping
7 - upland hill slope or foot slope
11 - No
13 - No
18 - Moderately Fine
23 - Moderately Fine
28 - Moderately Fine
32 - Blocky
37 - Somewhat poorly drained
39 - Deep
43 - Deep
3 - 6-12% sloping
7 - upland hill slope or foot slope
11 - No
13 - No
17 - Medium
22 - Medium
28 - Moderately Fine
32 - Blocky
36 - Moderately well drained
39 - Deep
43 - Deep
Part 1 - Points per Item10
80
Part 1 Soil Prop. - Site 3
PartContestantJudge
11 - 0-2% nearly level
8 - upland depression or flat
11 - No
13 - No
18 - Moderately Fine
23 - Moderately Fine
28 - Moderately Fine
32 - Blocky
37 - Somewhat poorly drained
39 - Deep
43 - Deep
2 - 2-6% gently sloping
7 - upland hill slope or foot slope
11 - No
13 - No
17 - Medium
24 - Fine
29 - Fine
32 - Blocky
37 - Somewhat poorly drained
40 - Moderately deep
43 - Deep
Part 1 - Points per Item10
50
Part 1 Soil Prop. - Site 4
PartContestantJudge
13 - 6-12% sloping
7 - upland hill slope or foot slope
11 - No
13 - No
18 - Moderately Fine
23 - Moderately Fine
28 - Moderately Fine
31 - Granular
37 - Somewhat poorly drained
39 - Deep
43 - Deep
3 - 6-12% sloping
7 - upland hill slope or foot slope
11 - No
13 - No
18 - Moderately Fine
24 - Fine
29 - Fine
32 - Blocky
37 - Somewhat poorly drained
40 - Moderately deep
43 - Deep
Part 1 - Points per Item10
70
Part 1 Soil Prop. - Total
280
Part 2 Overall Risk - Site 1
PartContestantJudge
1Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Part 2 - Points per Item5
20
Part 2 Overall Risk - Site 2
PartContestantJudge
1Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Part 2 - Points per Item5
20
Part 2 Overall Risk - Site 3
PartContestantJudge
1Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Severe
Moderate
Moderate
Severe
Part 2 - Points per Item5
10
Part 2 Overall Risk - Site 4
PartContestantJudge
1Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Severe
Moderate
Moderate
Severe
Part 2 - Points per Item5
10
Part 2 Overall Risk - Total
60
Part 3 Management - Site 1
PartContestantJudge
1









Part 3 - Points per Item4
112
Part 3 Management - Site 2
PartContestantJudge
1










Part 3 - Points per Item4
84
Part 3 Management - Site 3
PartContestantJudge
1










Part 3 - Points per Item4
108
Part 3 Management - Site 4
PartContestantJudge
1














Part 3 - Points per Item4
84
Part 3 Management - Total
388
Site 1 Total
212
Site 2 Total
184
Site 3 Total
168
Site 4 Total
164
Written Exam Section A
PartContestantJudge
1BA
2CC
3BA
4DC
5AC
6CB
7DD
8CC
9CB
10BA
11DD
12AB
13DB
14DC
15DD
Written Exam A - Points per Question4
20
Written Exam Section B
PartContestantJudge
1AA
2EE
3EA
4CE
5BE
6AB
7EE
8DD
9CA
10BE
Written Exam B - Points Per Question4
16


AWS100: Tuesday, November 4, 2025