Tennessee State Land Judging
Oct 20, 2025
Tennessee FFA Land Evaluation
Overall

ID: 25 - -
Team Name: Haywood
Participant Name:
WYATT POOLE
Individual Rank: 48
Individual Total Score: 235
Team Rank: 11
Team Total Score: 922
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Gently sloping
Moderate
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
25
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Shallow
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Low
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
34
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
None to slight
Footslope
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
35
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
Medium
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Excessively drained
Many
Low
Nearly level
None to slight
Flood Plain
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
21
Part 1 Total
115
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
Medium
Low
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
9
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Medium
High
Low
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
14
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
High
Medium
High
High
High
Low
Class II
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Medium
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
14
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
Low
Class II
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Low
Medium
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
10
Part 2 Total
47
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservationAnnual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
0
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
15
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
9
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
3
Part 3 Total
27
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
10
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
10
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
10
Part 4 Total
46
Field 1 Total
44
Field 2 Total
73
Field 3 Total
74
Field 4 Total
44


AWS100: Tuesday, November 4, 2025