Tennessee State Land Judging
Oct 20, 2025
Tennessee FFA Land Evaluation
Overall

ID: 301 - -
Team Name: WILSON CENTRAL
Participant Name:
OWEN MILLS
Individual Rank: 37
Individual Total Score: 311
Team Rank: 4
Team Total Score: 1048
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
40
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
46
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
None to slight
Footslope
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
35
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Excessively drained
Many
Low
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Excessively drained
Many
Low
Nearly level
None to slight
Flood Plain
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
35
Part 1 Total
156
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Medium
Low
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
16
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
23
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Class II
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Medium
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
14
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Low
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Low
Medium
Medium
High
Class II
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Low
Medium
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
12
Part 2 Total
65
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
3
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
15
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
9
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
3
Part 3 Total
30
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
12
Part 4 Total
60
Field 1 Total
75
Field 2 Total
100
Field 3 Total
74
Field 4 Total
62


AWS100: Monday, November 3, 2025