Tennessee State Land Judging
Oct 20, 2025
Tennessee FFA Land Evaluation
Overall

ID: 187 - -
Team Name: Grainger County
Participant Name:
CHESNEY CAMERON
Individual Rank: 40
Individual Total Score: 298
Team Rank: 8
Team Total Score: 973
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
40
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
34
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
None to slight
Footslope
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
41
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
Common
Medium
Gently sloping
None to slight
Flood Plain
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Excessively drained
Many
Low
Nearly level
None to slight
Flood Plain
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
20
Part 1 Total
135
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
19
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
Medium
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
17
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Medium
Low
Class II
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Medium
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
22
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Low
Class II
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Low
Medium
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
13
Part 2 Total
71
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
3
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
15
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
15
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
3
Part 3 Total
36
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
10
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Poor
Fair
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
14
Part 4 Total
56
Field 1 Total
78
Field 2 Total
76
Field 3 Total
94
Field 4 Total
50


AWS100: Tuesday, November 4, 2025