Tennessee State Land Judging
Oct 20, 2025
Tennessee FFA Land Evaluation
Overall

ID: 187 - -
Team Name: Grainger County
Participant Name:
ELIGAN MORGAN
Individual Rank: 7
Individual Total Score: 350
Team Rank: 8
Team Total Score: 973
View e-Scansheet

DefinitionResponsesScore
Part 1 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Nearly level
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
46
Part 1 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Moderately deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
Medium
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Sloping
None to slight
Upland or terrace
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
34
Part 1 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
None to slight
Footslope
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
None or few
High
Gently sloping
None to slight
Footslope
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
46
Part 1 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Well-drained
Many
Low
Nearly level
None to slight
Flood Plain
Medium
Medium
Deep
None or few
Excessively drained
Many
Low
Nearly level
None to slight
Flood Plain
Part 1 Point Values5562626635
40
Part 1 Total
166
Part 2 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Class I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
23
Part 2 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Class IV
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Low
Low
Medium
Low
High
Medium
High
Medium
Medium
Class III
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
High
High
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
8
Part 2 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Class II
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Class II
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Medium
Low
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
21
Part 2 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Class VI
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Class II
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Low
Medium
Part 2 Point Value411111111111111122
16
Part 2 Total
68
Part 3 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
14
Part 3 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with grass/legume
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
15
Part 3 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Annual crops with intensive conservation
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
15
Part 3 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Grass/legume cover
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Annual crops with minimal conservation
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Part 3 Point Values6111111111
8
Part 3 Total
52
Part 4 - Field 1
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 2
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 3
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 - Field 4
PartContestantJudge
1Good
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Part 4 Point Values2222224
16
Part 4 Total
64
Field 1 Total
99
Field 2 Total
73
Field 3 Total
98
Field 4 Total
80


AWS100: Tuesday, November 4, 2025